Martin Klizan vs Casper Ruud Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Klizan vs C. Ruud

Martin Klizan
SVK
l
w
w
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
36
Age
26
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
735
C. Rank
12
24
Best Rank
2
6
Total Titles
14
0
YTD Titles
2
$3.0M
Career Money
$13.8M
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Casper Ruud
NOR
l
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
36
Age
26
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
735
C. Rank
12
24
Best Rank
2
6
Total Titles
14
0
YTD Titles
2
$3.0M
Career Money
$13.8M
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Klizan 1 - 0 Ruud
They have played 2 sets in total, with Martin Klizan winning 2 and Casper Ruud winning 0. The last match between Martin Klizan and Casper Ruud was at the Rome Challenger, 26-09-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Martin Klizan getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Klizan | 1 |
| Ruud | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Rome Challenger(09-26-17)
Martin Klizan
6
6
Casper Ruud
2
4
M. Klizan vs C. Ruud H2H Profile
M. Klizan vs C. Ruud Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Martin Klizan has won 53.85% of points on their second serve, while Casper Ruud has won 47.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Martin Klizan, in recent form, has won 48.42% of their opponent's second serve points, while Casper Ruud has won 45.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.24% and 21.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Martin Klizan has saved 60.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Casper Ruud has saved 49.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Martin Klizan has won 52.00% of matches played (W/L 13/12), with Casper Ruud winning 69.64% (W/L 39/17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Martin Klizan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 332/193), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 4/15). Casper Ruud has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 251/109), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 5/8).
- Player level: In the last year, Martin Klizan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 7/5), where as Casper Ruud has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 79.17% of matches (W/L 19/5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Martin Klizan winning 1 times and Casper Ruud being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Martin Klizan winning 2 and Casper Ruud winning 0.
- The last match between Martin Klizan and Casper Ruud was at the Rome Challenger, 26-09-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Martin Klizan getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:3.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Martin Klizan has played against opponents with an average rank of 306.72 while Casper Ruud has played against players with an average rank of 69.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Martin Klizan has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Casper Ruud has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Martin Klizan has converted 13.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Casper Ruud has converted 28.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Martin Klizan vs Casper Ruud Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Klizan vs C. Ruud H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:25:3 | Average Match Time | 1:25:3 |
| 74% (42/57) | 1st Serve % | 81% (55/68) |
| 76% (32/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (37/55) |
| 53% (8/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 15% (2/13) |
| 25% (3/12) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/6) |
| 43% (29/68) | Return Points Win % | 30% (17/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Klizan 46%, Ruud 53%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Klizan 50%, Ruud 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Klizan 60%, Ruud 65%.
M. Klizan Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(3) 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||
C. Ruud Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
QF | L | 7-6(1) ret. | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 7-6(3) | ||
F | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||

M. Klizan vs C. Ruud Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.12% (526/379) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.02% (448/241) |
| 55.72% (1212/963) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.23% (1047/663) |
| 51.95% (10641/9842) | Games Win/Loss | 54.23% (8899/7512) |
| 49.44% (88/90) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.20% (118/78) |
| 63.24% (332/193) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.72% (251/109) |
| 55.74% (102/81) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.67% (74/46) |
| 21.05% (4/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 38.46% (5/8) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 2631 | Aces Total | 2992 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2236 | Total Double Faults | 1482 |
| 1:11:34 | Average Match Time | 1:40:36 |
| 566.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 327.61 |
| 58% (28357/49210) | 1st Serve % | 65% (31257/48074) |
| 69% (19552/28357) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (22335/31257) |
| 50% (10437/20853) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8997/16817) |
| 44% (2089/4705) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1853/4486) |
| 39% (18622/47195) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18230/47990) |
| 44.12% (30/38) | Slam W/L | 65.96% (62/32) |
| 30.61% (15/34) | Masters W/L | 60.29% (82/54) |
| 67.74% (21/10) | Cups W/L | 77.14% (27/8) |
| 59.84% (146/98) | Main Tour W/L | 67.12% (147/72) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 57.06% (194/146) | Challenger W/L | 57.69% (60/44) |
| 69.77% (120/52) | Futures W/L | 71.43% (60/24) |
| 60% (485/814) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (391/594) |
| 42% (30/72) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 61% (54/88) |
| 53% (160/304) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (129/250) |
| 57% (161/281) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (123/204) |
| 85% (506/429) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (427/384) |
| 15% (506/77) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (427/43) |
| 24% (396/94) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (262/65) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction04:15 PM 15/11/25
Prediction06:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction12:10 AM 16/11/25
Prediction11:10 PM 15/11/25
Prediction10:00 PM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Kaja Juvan vs Sahaja Yamalapalli Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group G – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Liam Broady vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Jannik Sinner vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Zverev Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Shelton H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
16:15
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
14:05
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal